‘24 Season 5 – 4 PM to 5 PM – The Lynn McGill School of Management vs. Section 112

February 27th, 2006 by Izumino

KR3.jpg

The Body Count Du Jour is 57. The detailed menu is served cold here.

And next week Tony and Kim are back! Oh Dear God In Heaven Thank You Thank You Thank You!

Visiting The Nutmeg State

February 26th, 2006 by Izumino

cimg2931.jpg

Maddy had the week off, I had some frequent flyer miles, and before you knew it, we left Deena and Coop cooling their heels and went to see the folks. We went snow tubing, survived the Boston Museum of Science, put in a sink for my sister (which leaks), set up a wireless LAN for my sister (which stopped working as soon as I stepped back on the plane), taught my Mom to rip and burn a CD, and saw my childhood friend and my college friend. I ask you, does life get any more exciting than that? More pictures HERE, incldng my doomed attempt at fixing the water pressure in my shower…

‘24′ Season 5 – 3PM – 4 PM – Data Mining The Thumbnail Drive During A Level 2/3 Protocol

February 20th, 2006 by Izumino

pat_keifer1.jpg

–What is the point of taking Jack’s gun when he’s a human weapon??
–Jack to Curtis: “Don’t fight it.” Isn’t this what Jack said in prison?
–Finally – a First Lady who’s kickass!

And the Body Count Du Jour details are here… Current Total: 51! Go Jack Go!

Keifer timeline HERE.

The First Lady Is Seriously Off Her Rocker

February 20th, 2006 by Izumino

About the only thing viewers might not have been able to anticipate was that this season’s break-out character would be a high-strung, sharp-tongued and off-her-meds first lady of the United States, a woman who screams, “I will have your family eating dog food out of a can” at Secret Service agents trying to keep her away from a presidential news conference. Jean Smart’s first on-screen appearance as Martha Logan, perhaps the most memorable character debut in “24″ history, consists of her looking into a mirror, assessing her make-up and proclaiming, “I look like a wedding cake” just before dunking her face in the bathroom sink.
Read the rest of this entry »

Chuck Klosterman Is Spot On!

February 17th, 2006 by Izumino

Invention’s New Mother

By Chuck Klosterman | Mar 1, 2006

It would be imprecise to claim that texting has changed the way I communicate, because it didn’t replace any existing method of communication in my life. Texting has created a completely new genre of personal expression: the postextraneous sentiment. Sometimes I text sentences I wouldn’t waste my time saying aloud , even if the recipient were standing right next to me. I can’t text complex thoughts because it’s too time-consuming to push the little buttons, and I can’t figure out how to generate apostrophes. (I text the way Data talks on Star Trek: The Next Generation —no contractions.) Nonetheless, nobody ever minds getting a text message, regardless of how frivolous the content may be. For some reason, texting feels substantially less intrusive than e-mail; it doesn’t have much upside, but it’s wholly devoid of downside.
Read the rest of this entry »

Fun New Toys For Kids

February 17th, 2006 by Izumino

phantasm.jpg

Worth1000.com | Photoshop Contests | Are you Worthy™ | contest

The Bubble Project

February 16th, 2006 by Izumino

The Bubble Project

Read about this in the new GIANT ROBOT. Tool cool!

Brad Rants – #1 In A Series – “Too Depressing”

February 16th, 2006 by Izumino

nd1.jpg

It’s Oscar movie season, and so many people I know are catching up on the Oscar nominees for BEST PICTURE. And several people have mentioned to me, either after seeing one of these movies, or as an excuse not to see one of these movies (or not go to movies like them), that these kinds are movies are “Too Depressing.” (I also hear this about books all the time, or, to more specific, books that aren’t THE DA VINCI CODE…)

Now, what do people actually mean by “Too Depressing”? Do they mean that after seeing the movie, they literally became clinically depressed, locking themselves in a room, weeping uncontrollably and rocking back and forth, not communicating with friends and family, eventually seeking psychiatric help? I don’t think so. When people say “depressing”, what they really mean is “serious“, and when they say “serious” what they really mean is “It made me think about things that are unfair or unjust or sad or complex and difficult“. With the “too depressing” comment usually comes the amusing “I get enough of this stuff in real life!”.

But do these people really get enough of this stuff in real life? For instance – are my friends and acquaintances members of Mossad, who deal on a day-to-day basis with existential meaning issues when trying to “defeat” terrorism, as in MUNICH? Are they cowboys with inarticulate longings that have a difficult time understanding and controlling in a hostile world? Are they dealing with issues of race and injustice in our mostly white, cubicle-led corporate environment? Once again, I think not.

Instead, I would conjecture that these Oscar movies, and other “serious” movies and books, provoke thought, both good and bad, about happy and sad things, simple and complex, deeply felt religious conviction and Godlessness. And such thought raises issues of cognitive dissonance – how can things be this way? What is my part in things being this? Have I done something to cause this? Shouldn’t I be doing something to stop it? And this cognitive dissonance provokes guilt, and sadness, which, I suppose, if you decide not to do anything about it, and realize you are, by not acting, actually contributing to these problems, would be “depressing”.

Now I’m not saying these movies are all that great, or that the “serious” books that I read are necessarily all that much better than THE DA VINCI CODE. And I’m not saying I don’t like “light” entertainment (as a matter of fact, I thought THE WEDDING CRASHERS and THE 40 YEAR OLD VIRGIN were two of the better movies of last year). However, if you stop trying to think about things, and you stop trying to learn new things or look at things in a different way, and you don’t include these things in your life–well, what the heck kind of life do you have? Aren’t you just amusing yourself to death? Now that’s depressing!

‘24′ Season 5 – 2 PM – 3 PM – Bring Back Kim!!

February 14th, 2006 by Izumino

elisha-cuthbert-gl12.jpg

Our Father Who Art In Heaven–

Why hast thou foresaken me? I could have sworn Kim was supposed to be on tonight’s episode. Why have I done to offend thee? Bring back the Kimster!

Body Count Du Jour: 45.

Dave Barry has some good comments HERE.

Brad’s Book Corner: Eight Hours With Ross MacDonald

February 13th, 2006 by Izumino

rmd.jpg

Ross MacDonald Fan 1: Hey–I’m re-reading an old Ross MacDonald novel!
Ross MacDonald Fan 2: Really? Which one?
Ross MacDonald Fan 1: You know, the one where a wayward youth from a well-off family is involved in a crime that, upon further investigation by private detective Lew Archer, turns out to be related to a complex history of other crimes in the families past, hidden by family members, but the effects of which are played out in the lives of their children, often mirroring classical Roman and Greek themes.
Ross MacDonald Fan 2: I loved that one!

If you’re a fan of detective fiction., you know there’s the BIg Three — Dashiel Hammett, who started the whole hard-boiled thing, taking crimes out of the locked study and back into the streets where they belonged; Raymond Chandler, who put the whole thing into a larger social context and pretty much created the hard-boiled jaded romantic writing style, and then Ross MacDonald, who downplayed the gunplay and explored the psychological underpinnings of crime and family relationships with a surgical precision and an amazing amount of empathy for everyone involved, good and bad.

I’ve been subscribing to Audible.com for podcasts of THIS AMERICAN LIFE, and my monthly subscription includes two free “books on pod” a month. Just for fun, I picked the unadbridged version of Ross MacDonald’s SLEEPING BEAUTY–eight hours of it, which I’ve been listening to on the way to and from work. It’s quite an experience “listening” to a book you’ve read two or three times in your life already, and well worth the time. When you’re reading a book, you can read too fast, or get distracted. But when you’re listening in the car, barring traffic accidents or emergencies, you can just let the whole thing roll over you, and really get absorbed. And when you’ve read the book a few times already, you can get a much better feel for the structural genius RM had–how he came up with these labryinthine plots is beyond me. And if you’ve read Ross MacDonald: A Biography, this particular book becomes all the more haunting when you consider RM’s relationshp with his own troubled daughter. And if you have children of your own, you can’t help but wonder what your effect will be on them…

If you haven’t read any Ross MacDonald novels, I’d highly recommend them. Most of my good friends have read them; Warren Zevon could quote from them, and the world is a better place for them having been written.

about


I am Brad. This is my Blog-ola. All you kids with your Facebooks and your Twitters...in the old days all we had was a rawhide Blog-ola, and we were lucky to get that!

search

navigation

archives

categories